The introduction of one person to every decision-making body which actively thinks outside of the box and against the solutions on the table could be a viable means to allow for a more diverse and faceted set of alternatives in decision-making promising to improve the effectiveness of policies.
Proponents: Bruno Frey, Dirk Helbing
For further interest on this topic:
Reason for intervention | "Politics of No Alternative", Fraction discipline, path depedency in decision-m |
---|---|
Institutional impact | |
Governance level | |
Maturity | |
Radicality | |
Legitimacy decision | |
Background |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |